Hyperbaric oxygen therapy reviews

Hyperbaric therapy is real.
Not every chamber is.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy reviews, where we look at the studies and the chambers to help you decide if hyperbaric is something you should be leaning into.

12studies, all linked
7conditions reviewed
25chambers tracked
5fully audited

The research

What the evidence actually supports.

Strong in some areas, mixed in others, early in the rest. We say which is which, and link every study.

Read the sources

Efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials

Diabetic foot ulcers · PubMed Central · Systematic review and meta-analysis

Concludes HBOT is an effective adjunct treatment for diabetic foot ulcers.

Read the study

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for nonischemic diabetic ulcers: a systematic review

Diabetic foot ulcers · Wound Repair and Regeneration (Lalieu et al.) · 2020 · Systematic review

Seven studies, only two of them randomized trials, so this narrower subgroup is thinly supported.

Read the study

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for late radiation tissue injury

Late radiation tissue injury · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2023 update, Lin et al.) · 2023 · Cochrane systematic review

Reports low- to moderate-certainty evidence that HBOT improves outcomes for late radiation injury of head and neck bone and soft tissue, and some low-certainty evidence of complete resolution or significant improvement.

Read the study

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy can improve post-concussion syndrome years after mild traumatic brain injury: a randomized prospective trial

Mild TBI and post-concussion symptoms · PLOS ONE · 2013 · Randomized prospective trial

56 patients, 1 to 5 years after mild TBI with lingering post-concussion syndrome. The trial reported improvement with HBOT.

Read the study

Systematic review and dosage analysis: HBOT efficacy in mild traumatic brain injury persistent postconcussion syndrome

Mild TBI and post-concussion symptoms · PubMed Central · 2022 · Systematic review

Reports that multiple randomized and controlled studies showed statistically significant symptom and cognitive improvement with HBOT at 1.5 ATA.

Read the study

All 12 studies

The audit

We read the spec sheet so you don't have to.

Most buyers compare brochures. We compare a manufacturer's own pages against each other, and against the FDA record.

A real example: OxyHealth Quamvis 320

The product page says 1.3 ATA. The company's comparison page says "Up to 1.5 ATA." The same chamber, two pressures. That is exactly the kind of thing to ask about before you spend five figures.

Read the full audit

How it works

From confusion to the right machine in three steps.

  1. Read the research and the audits

    The studies, plainly summarized. Specs straight from the manufacturer, claims quoted, discrepancies flagged.

  2. Book a 15-minute call

    Tell us your goals, space and budget. No pressure, no script.

  3. Get pointed to the right chamber

    A short list that fits you, and the questions to ask before you buy.

Not all chambers are created equal.

Fifteen minutes can save you from the wrong five-figure purchase.

Book your 15-minute call

Follow along

New studies, chamber audits and what we're learning, as we publish them.

Book a 15-minute call

Free, no obligation. Pick a day and time.

Select a date